"The Road to Retirement", MSCI Research Insight, January 2011
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Defined Contribution (DC) plans are rapidly becoming the primary retirement investment vehicle for a majority of employees across the US and other markets around the globe. Asset allocation for DC plans has to strike a balance between growth and protection assets over the savings lifecycle while protecting the long-term purchasing power of the nest egg. Due to the long duration of retirement investing and various risks associated with it, implementing the right asset allocation has become critical and challenging for DC plans.
The unique Risk Focused methodology presented in this paper aims to address the shortcomings of conventional Target Date Funds experienced during the 2008 financial crisis. The proposed approach addresses the cumulative impact of shortfall, sequence of returns, longevity, and market risks in determining asset allocation at different time horizons. This is accomplished by combining the term structure of risk, return, and covariance of asset classes with an explicit risk budget. The Risk Focused glide path potentially delivers comparable retirement wealth outcomes with enhanced downside protection, lower journey volatility, and attempts to facilitate a smoother journey on the road to retirement. Hence, the caption of the paper, “ Road to Retirement – Bumpy or Smooth, Depends on your Route”.
Publication: MSCI Research Insight
Authors: MSCI Applied Research
"Lagrangian Relaxation Procedure for Cardinality - constrained Portfolio Optimization",
Topic: Portfolio Construction and Optimization |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
This paper studies a portfolio-selection problem subject to a cardinality constraint, that is, the number of securities in a portfolio is restricted to a certain limit. The problem is formulated as a cardinality-constrained quadratic programming problem, and a dedicated Lagrangian relaxation method is developed. In contrast to many existing Lagrangian relaxation methods, the approach presented in the paper is able to take advantage of the special structure of the objective function rather than the special structure of the constraints. The algorithm developed here has been applied to track the major market indices, such as the S&P 500, S&P 100, FTSE 100, and FTSE 250, using real data, and the computational results are promising.
To access the full paper, you need to be a subscriber to the Optimization Methods and Software.
Publication: Optimization Methods and Software
Authors: KOPMAN Leonid, LIU Scott, SHAW Dong
"CreditMetrics and Constant Level of Risk", MSCI Research Insight, September 2010
Topic: Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
In this paper, a framework is developed to think through the interpretation of an important piece of the new Basel guidelines for setting trading book capital. This piece – the Incremental Risk Charge (IRC) – is intended to cover default and migration risks in the trading book. Any bank that already has approval to use their internal models to set VaR-based trading book capital will be required to come up with an IRC model by the end of 2011. An important aspect of the IRC framework is the provision that positions are rebalanced over the annual horizon so as to maintain a Constant Level of Risk. Much of the model development comes down to how to interpret and implement this provision. I discuss three distinct mechanisms by which rebalancing impacts risk, and present the ideas of how our modeling framework captures each of these. I then perform a benchmarking exercise, applying our model to a number of representative portfolios in order to assess the impact of each of the rebalancing mechanisms. Finally, I compare the results from our model to the capital from the Basel banking book model (the IRB), as well as another IRC model from the literature. This exercise can serve as a template for how we could use our model (and product) to benchmark client or prospect portfolios.
Publication: MSCI Research Insight
Authors: FINGER, Christopher
"Stress Testing in the Investment Process", Research Insight, August 2010
Topic: Investing (Investment Management), Portfolio Construction and Optimization, Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
This paper presents a framework for conducting effective stress tests and incorporating insights from stress tests in portfolio construction. We examine how to determine the scope of the test, how to construct severe, but plausible scenarios, how to transmit the shock to the portfolio and how to incorporate the results of stress tests in portfolio construction. Stress testing can be a useful complement to risk model outputs, such as volatility, VaR, and expected shortfall. The key advantage of stress tests is that the loss is linked to a specific event, which can be more meaningful to portfolio managers than a summary statistic of a loss distribution. Prior research on stress testing has concentrated on ways to develop realistic and relevant shocks. The framework presented here attempts to expand on this, by illustrating that stress testing is a broader process addressing a wide range of investment problems and is useful in all stages of investment decisions.
Publication: Research Insight
Authors: MELAS Dimitris, RUBAN Oleg
"Extreme Risk Analysis", The Journal of Performance Measurement, Spring 2010
Topic: Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Risk analysis involves gaining deeper insight into the sources of risk, and evaluating whether these risks accurately reflect the views of the portfolio manager. In this paper, we show how to extend standard volatility analytics to shortfall, a measure of extreme risk. Using two examples, we show how shortfall provides a more complete and intuitive picture of risk than value at risk. In two subsequent examples we illustrate the additional perspective offered by analyzing shortfall and volatility in tandem.
Publication: The Journal of Performance Measurement
Authors: GOLDBERG Lisa, HAYES Michael, MENCHERO Jose, MITRA Indrajit
"The Perils of Parity", MSCI Barra Research Insight, May 2010
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management, Investing (Investment Management), Portfolio Construction and Optimization, Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
This paper examines the recent trend of adding leverage to fixed income allocations of multi-asset class portfolios of large asset owners. We show that the optimality of adding leverage from a volatility-reduction perspective depends on the correlations between bonds and equities, the relative volatility of bonds versus equities, and the weights of the two asset classes in the portfolio. If correlations between bonds and equities are negative, adding leverage could reduce the volatility of a portfolio, especially if the weight in fixed income assets is low, leverage is moderate, and bonds have a low risk relative to equities. Negative correlations also increase the likelihood that adding leverage will improve the risk-return profile of the portfolio. Asset owners considering adding leverage to their fixed income allocation can examine these influences to decide whether negative correlations between bonds and equities, a low ratio of bond to equity volatility, and higher risk-adjusted returns of bonds relative to equities are likely to persist.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insight
Authors: MELAS Dimitris, RUBAN Oleg
"Sovereign Stress and Economic Growth: Scenarios for US Investors", MSCI Barra Research Bulletin, May 2010
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management, Investing (Investment Management), Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
This research bulletin is the first in a series covering various aspects of stress testing and scenario analysis. In this paper, we compare and contrast two historical scenarios that may be of current interest given the increasing uncertainty regarding the returns on sovereign fixed income investments. The scenarios we consider here are the 1998 Russian debt crisis and the 1994 US rate hike that followed the savings and loan (S&L) crisis. We put a stylized US pension plan through the stress tests using BarraOne, a risk platform that provides more than 60 preloaded historical scenarios from the 1970s to the present. Each scenario that we consider applies shocks to global market factors for equities, interest rates, credit spreads, FX rates, and commodities. We review the effect of the scenarios on the pension plan, and we discuss possible hedges.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Bulletin
Authors: BRIAND Remy, MSCI Barra Applied Research , VANNEREM Philippe
"Beyond Brinson: Establishing the Link Between Sector and Factor Models", MSCI Barra Research Insight, April 2010
Topic: Performance Analysis |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Brinson sector-based attribution explains active return in terms of intuitive allocation and selection decisions. However, it cannot easily disentangle competing industry and style effects. We introduce a special type of factor model with five defining characteristics that exactly replicates the classic Brinson model. We show that this “Brinson-replicating” factor model easily extends to explain more general types of investment processes. In this extension, returns are decomposed into style effects and pure industry effects, net of styles. Moreover, much of the classic Brinson model “stock selection effect” is attributed to contributions from a handful of style factors. We show that in this framework risk and return can be attributed to the same set of decision variables. This provides a means of comparing return contributions on a risk-adjusted basis.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insight
Authors: DAVIS Ben, MENCHERO Jose
"Risk Characteristics of Emerging Market Bonds", MSCI Barra Research Insights, March 2010
Topic: Investing (Investment Management), Risk Management |
Asset Class: Fixed Income, Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
In 2009, emerging market bonds were among the top-performing assets in comparison to both global equity and fixed income. The recent, rapid rise in US Treasury yields and the concern over tightening monetary policies in certain countries led us to evaluate the relationship between global interest rate risks and emerging market bonds. We look at the risk characteristics of the market, along with the historical relationship of emerging market bonds with US Treasuries, other developed market sovereign bonds, and equity market volatility. We consider possible warning signals of impending volatility in emerging market bonds during the period we observed, as well as possible ways to have improved the diversification benefits with equities.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insights
Authors: ANAND Iyer, OWYONG David
"Risk Target Optimization", MSCI Barra Research Insights, December 2009
Topic: Portfolio Construction and Optimization |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
As an alternative to mean-variance portfolio optimization, Barra Optimizer offers users an option to run risk target optimization. Instead of risk being controlled implicitly with the risk aversion parameters, the risk target is explicitly specified by the user. When the risk target is achievable and efficient, the optimized portfolio will have risk (or tracking error) equal to the specified target. The risk target may be too low due to the problem constraints; it may also be too high, that is, not achievable due to the constraints; or it may not be efficient due to the transaction costs and/or asset returns.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insights
Authors: KOPMAN Leonid, LIU Scott
"Analyzing the Extreme Risk of a US Corporate Bond Portfolio", MSCI Barra Research Insight, November 2009
Topic: Portfolio Construction and Optimization |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
We use the Barra Extreme Risk (BxR) model to analyze a US dollar-denominated corporate bond portfolio consisting of 2142 distinct issues. As in the case of equities, we find that the BxR proprietary extreme risk forecasts, xShortfall and xVaR, are higher than value-at-risk and expected-shortfall forecasts generated by a conditionally normal model. Further, the impact on xShortfall of tilting the portfolio toward high-yield bonds is materially greater than the impact on volatility, and the discrepancy increases as quality declines. As a result, increasing the weight on investment-grade bonds while lowering the weight on high-yield bonds mitigates tail risk more than it mitigates volatility. This intuitive result reflects the high degree of sensitivity of high-yield bonds to extreme events.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insight
Authors: CHAN Peter, TSANG Eric
"Portfolio BCP: Applying Business Continuity Practices", MSCI Barra Research Insight, October 2009
Topic: Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Catastrophic events can lead to change in established practices. This paper argues that organizations may get a competitive advantage by applying practices used in Business Continuity Planning (BCP) to the management of institutional portfolios. We propose a framework to prepare for extreme market events and mitigate their impact. This paper describes the required elements of BCP as applied to portfolios, reviews the tools and processes necessary to monitor the level of stress in financial markets, and tests the effectiveness of a number of mitigating strategies.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insight
Authors: BRIAND Remy, OWYONG David
"The Stock-Bond Relationship and Asset Allocation", MSCI Barra Research Bulletin, October 2009
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The relationship between stocks and bonds has important implications for asset allocation and risk diversification. This Research Bulletin examines the recent history of this relationship in the G5 economies. It also uses the multi-asset class platform of the Barra Integrated Model (BIM) to consider some of the possible drivers behind the evolution of this relationship. In addition, it is shown that scenario testing is useful in determining the impact on the stock-bond correlation from possible future scenarios. An inflation surprise accompanied by quicker-than-expected Fed hikes, for instance, would likely imply an increase in the optimal allocation to global equities at the expense of global bonds.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Bulletin
Authors: MSCI Barra Applied Research
"Backtesting GEM vs. GEM2: Global Beta Performance Attribution", MSCI Barra Research Bulletin, October 2009
Topic: Portfolio Construction and Optimization |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The Barra Global Equity Model (GEM2) introduced Volatility, a new factor that provides managers with a tool that enables close control of a portfolios' exposure to global beta. GEM2's Volatility factor includes global beta as its most significant descriptor. In contrast its predecessor, GEM, provided much less control, i.e., only through exposures to country factors. In this Research Bulletin, we backtest a high global beta portfolio using both GEM and GEM2, and we use performance attribution to demonstrate the advantages of using GEM2
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Bulletin
Authors: MSCI Barra Applied Research
"Forecast Risk Bias in Optimized Portfolios", MSCI Barra Research Insight, October 2009
Topic: Portfolio Construction and Optimization |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
When there is noise in a covariance matrix, portfolio optimization tends to produce portfolios for which the risk forecasts are underestimates of the true risk. In this paper, we take a closer look at the connection between estimation error and the underestimation of the risk of optimized portfolios. We pay special attention to the case in which returns have a known factor structure. There, the bias in optimization can be reduced dramatically by using a covariance matrix based on a factor model, rather than one computed from historical asset covariances. Moreover, our analysis reveals that for many active portfolios, the bias in factor-model forecasts is less than previously thought. Lastly, we discuss the role of constraints in mitigating risk forecasting bias.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insight
Authors: BENDER Jennifer, LEE Jyh-Huei, STEFEK Dan, Yao Jay
"Modeling Value at Risk with Factors", MSCI Barra Model Insight, October 2009
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Factor models are standards in investment management. For decades, Barra factor models have provided valuable risk forecasts and inputs for the portfolio construction process. Most uses of factor models have targeted longer horizons of months or years. However, we demonstrate in this paper that factor models can also provide accurate risk forecasts for shorter horizons of one to ten days. Furthermore, factor models have the advantage of explaining risk sources and providing consistency in risk management processes across all time horizons.We present a factor model with a methodology appropriately tailored to shorter horizons. Our basic approach is to retain the same common risk factors currently used in the Barra Integrated Model (BIM) and adopt a number of techniques that exploit daily data. As we show for different asset classes, markets, and sectors, this factor model approach yields similarly accurate shorter horizon risk forecasts compared to asset-by-asset approaches.
Publication: MSCI Barra Model Insight
Authors: BARBIERI Angelo, CHANG Kelly, DUBIKOVSKY Vladislav, Fox John
"Central Limits and Financial Risk", Quantitative Finance, September 2009
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Systematic model bias has been implicated in the global recession that began in 2007, and this bias can be traced back to assumptions about the normality of data. Nonetheless, the normal distribution continues to play a foundational role in quantitative finance. One reason for this is that the normal often emerges, without prompting, as the distribution of sums or averages of large collections of random variables. Precise statements of this miracle are known as Central Limit Theorems, and they appear throughout the physical and social sciences. In this note, we review some of the most widely-used Central Limit Theorems. Subsequently, we explore the gap between the normal distribution and financial risk. This can be traced to a failure of the financial data to satisfy the assumptions of even the most liberal versions of the Central Limit Theorem.
Publication: Quantitative Finance
Authors: BARBIERI Angelo, DUBIKOVSKY Vladislav, GLADKEVICH Alexei, GOLDBERG Lisa
"Family Ties", MSCI Barra Research Bulletin, July 2009
Topic: Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
After the market turmoil of the last two years, many institutional investors are revisiting the way they approach asset allocation. For decades, the traditional breakdown of asset classes has been along the lines of equities, fixed income, alternatives, etc., sometimes with domestic versus foreign flavors. The main point we highlight in this Research Bulletin is that many asset classes share the same underlying drivers. While this notion is a familiar one, the insights gained by analyzing common drivers of risk and return across asset classes are not always applied to decisions about asset allocation. For example, private equity investments share key fundamental drivers with public equities yet are often perceived as a separate and distinct asset class. Or in the case of corporate bonds, the credit worthiness of the bonds depends on the financial health of the issuing corporation, which in turn is linked to the performance of the company's equity securities. These types of underlying linkages can be addressed by factor-based models and can be used in factor-based asset allocation schemes.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Bulletins
Authors: MSCI Barra Applied Research
"Understanding the Tails of the Return Distribution", MSCI Barra Research Bulletin, May 2009
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Traditional models in finance rely heavily on the use of normal (Gaussian) distribution. Using examples of asset, factor and index returns, we illustrate that the assumption of normality does not capture the empirical properties of returns and volatility alone cannot be relied on as a measure of portfolio risk. We outline how extreme value theory can help to model the tails of the return distribution and, using data from 1996 to 2007, show how Barra Extreme Risk can improve estimates of Value at Risk for a collection of factor-tilted portfolios.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Bulletins
Authors: MSCI Barra Applied Research
"Extreme Risk Management", MSCI Barra Research Insight, February 2009
Topic: Risk Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Quantitative risk management relies on a constellation of tools that are used to analyze portfolio risk. We develop the standard toolkit, which includes betas, risk budgets and correlations, in a general, coherent, mnemonic framework centered around marginal risk contributions. We apply these tools to generate side-by-side analyses of volatility and expected shortfall, which is a measure of average portfolio excess of value-at-risk. We focus on two examples whose importance is highlighted by the current economic crisis. By examining downside protection provided by an out-of-the-money put option we show that the diversification benefit of the option is greater for a risk measure that is more highly concentrated in the tail of the distribution. By comparing two-asset portfolios that are distinguished only by the likelihood of coincident extreme events, we show that expected shortfall measures market contagion in a way that volatility cannot.
Publication: MSCI Barra Research Insights
Authors: GOLDBERG Lisa, HAYES Michael, MENCHERO Jose, MITRA Indrajit
"Using Lagrangian Relaxation to Obtain Small Portfolios", The Journal of Portfolio Management Winter 2009, Vol. 35, No. 2: pp. 75-79,
Topic: Portfolio Construction and Optimization |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Investors with small portfolios, or a limited number of securities in their portfolios, may benefit from a new portfolio optimization method. Placing a limit on the number of assets in a portfolio turns the ordinary mean variance portfolio optimization problem into a challenging puzzle, especially for larger investment universes. In response, practitioners typically employ either enumerative methods, such as branch-and-bound based on quadratic programming relaxation, or heuristic methods. Both approaches have their respective disadvantages in that quadratic programming–based branch-and-bound may fail to solve large problems in reasonable time and heuristics may produce solutions of unknown quality. The new method presented by the authors can be used to solve smaller problems to optimality. For larger problems, the method produces good heuristic solutions along with a useful estimate of their quality; that is, the distance from the optimum. The computational results are promising.
To access the full paper, you need to be a subscriber to the Journal of Portfolio Management.
Publication: The Journal of Portfolio Management,
Authors: KOPMAN Leonid, LIU Shucheng, SHAW Dong
"Custom Factor Attribution", Financial Analysts Journal, Volume 64, Number 2, CFA Institute
This document is available in hard copy only. Please contact us to request a copy.
Topic: Performance Analysis |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Portfolio analysts often use one set of decision variables for attributing portfolio returns and a different set for attributing risk. This practice obscures the relationship between the sources of risk and return. This article demonstrates how to align the attribution model with the investment process. The attribution methodology can be applied ex ante or ex post. A factor-based investment process illustrates the general framework. Specifically, active return, tracking error, and the information ratio are attributed to a user-defined set of factors that reflect the manager's investment decision-making process. A concrete example with actual market data, a style portfolio, and a parsimonious set of custom factors illustrates how to apply the analysis.
Publication: Financial Analysts Journal
Authors: MENCHERO Jose, PODURI Vijay
"Asset-Liability Modeling in BarraOne", MSCI Barra Model Insights, May 2007
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
This case study provides an introduction to modeling assets and liabilities for asset owners within BarraOne. We show how to use BarraOne to analyze both assets and liabilities in a shared framework for understanding risk and return. Our example uses zero coupon bond instruments to proxy for liabilities although other proxies may be easily substituted. We illustrate how to analyze the surplus risk of the portfolio focusing on market risk specifically. Other sources of risknonmarket or biometric riskare not addressed here but are discussed.
Publication: MSCI Barra Model Insights
Authors: MSCI Barra
"Global Capital Markets Yearbook 2006 (Review of Benchmark Performance Across Asset Classes)",
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The book analyzes the performance of various asset classes using our Global Capital Markets Index, International Equity Indices, Domestic Equity Indices for the US, Japan, and China, Fixed Income Indices, and Hedge Fund Indices. This year we also have a section covering our latest efforts in the world of benchmarks, namely, the MSCI REIT indices, High Dividend Yield Indices and the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) Countries Indices.
Publication: MSCI Barra Yearbook
Authors: MSCI Barra
"The Barra Integrated Model - Version 204", MSCI Barra Research Notes, September 2005
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The Barra Integrated Model (BIM) is a multi-asset class model for forecasting the asset and portfolio level risk of global equities, bonds, currencies, and commodities. The model uses innovative methods to couple broad asset coverage with the detailed analysis of Barra's models that focus on particular markets. This makes it suitable for a wide range of investment purposes, from conducting an in-depth analysis of a single-country portfolio to understanding the risk profile of a broad set of international investments.
Publication: Research Notes
Authors: HEMMATI Fati, HSIEH Agnes, PUCHKOV Anton V, STEFEK Dan
"The Barra Integrated Model, Version 203: Implications for Risk Forecasts", Barra Newsletter, Autumn 2004
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
This article describes these enhancements and their impact on a variety of portfolios. First, we describe the changes that are introduced with version 203 and provide references to research documents describing these enhancements in greater detail. Next, we examine the effects of these changes on correlations between markets and asset classes. We then explore the impact of changes on equity portfolios and fixed income portfolios. Finally, we examine the risk forecasts for several multi-market and multi-asset-class portfolios.
Publication: MSCI Barra Newsletter
Authors: GILFEDDER Neil
"The Barra Integrated Model: The Next Generation of Global Risk Models", Barra Newsletter, Spring 2004
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The Barra Integrated Model is a global-multi-asset class model that forecasts asset and portfolio level risk for global equities, bonds and currencies. Using innovative methods to couple broad asset coverage with detailed local market models, BIM provides in-depth analyses for single-country and global portfolios across asset classes. The Barra Integrated Model for equities is a major innovation that brings together more than 40 customized single market models in a unified global framework. Each locally estimated model captures the unique industries, style influences and idiosyncratic nature of that market. BIM, the union of these detailed single market models, provides a comprehensive global analysis that incorporates these purely local sources of risk and return. In contrast, classical global equity models reflect local influences largely through a single local market or country factor. There are a number of ways in which BIM can enhance the investment process and portfolio results. First, the bottom-up construction and local depth provided by BIM results in significantly more accurate estimates of tracking error and its decomposition. This additional level of granularity allows for precise control over portfolio construction and diversification, and allows portfolio managers to deliver more consistent results. Second, BIM's unified framework allows regional portfolio managers, risk officers and chief investment offers to rely on a single model for portfolio contruction, risk management and enterprise risk analysis throughout the organization, yielding a common language and framework invaluable for global asset management firms. Finally, the many local factors identified in the Barra Integrated Model reveal new sources of return that can be exploited in active investment strategies to ehance risk-adjusted returns.
Publication: MSCI Barra Newsletter
Authors: SENECHAL Edouard, SOMERVILLE Sara
"Fundamentals of Performance Attribution: Asset Allocation and Currency", Barra Research Insights, 2002
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The first article in this series explained the first principles behind the Brinson model. It also showed how simple it is to calculate exact multi-period attributes at the total level using those first principles. In the second article, we looked at different ways to measure the value added by stock selection. This article is about how to measure the value added by asset allocation and currency allocation. It is based on the example on pages 21-40 of Karnosky and Singer (1994). The Karnosky Singer spreadsheet shows the data and equations for this example. The example has been edited so that it adopts the perspective of an Australian investor, rather than a US investor. The numbers, however, remain unchanged. In particular, the example was constructed before adoption of the Euro, so the example still uses DEM as the currency for Germany.
Publication:
Authors: LAKER Damien
"The Barra Integrated Model", Barra Research Insights, 2002
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The Barra Integrated Model is a multi-asset class model for forecasting the asset and portfolio level risk of global equities, bonds and currencies. The model uses innovative methods to couple broad asset coverage with the detailed analysis of Barra's models that focus on particular markets. This makes it suitable for a wide range of investment purposes, from conducting an in-depth analysis of a single-country portfolio to understanding the risk profile of a broad set of international investments.
Publication: Barra Research Insights
Authors: STEFEK Dan
"The Business Case for Enterprise-Wide Risk Management", Barra Research Insights, 2002
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Risk management for a financial enterprise requires both the aggregation of positions across asset classes and the understanding of risks inherent in those positions. Thie is by no means a trivial task for modern organizatins, which may control many hundreds of thousands of positions invested in a variety of instruments traded across the globe. In order to obtain a solution, smplifications have typically been made both at the level of aggregation and risk analysis. For example, assets may be "grouped" according to their similarity, with a single group of assets being treated as homogeneous. While these simplifications may be unobjectionable for some purposes, certain applications demand a more sophisticated approach. Fortunately, the technology supporting this latter set of applications has evolved to a level where shortcuts in modeling the decision are no longer necessary. This article focuses on the business role of enterprise-wide risk analysis, where consistency is desirable between the analysis a the single portfolio level and the aggregated enterprise level. The clear implication is that the technology applicable to a single portfolio must be implemented enterprise-wide.
Publication:
Authors: RUDD Andrew, SHEIKH Aamir
"Aggregating Risk Across Multiple Asset Classes, Chapter 2", Barra Newsletter, Spring 2002
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The first article in this series defined the business role of the enterprise risk management and the need for consistency between the analysis on a small set of assets and an aggregated analysis across the enterprise. We concluded that a consistent analysis requires a covariance matrix for factors across many asset classes. This article will evaluate the two challenges presented by the business case. First, the length of the time series of factor realizations is frequently different for different asset classes. If all series are reduced to the length of the shortest series then we are effectively discarding information present in longer time series. A similar problem, that of missing observations, has a known solution in the EM algorithm. We apply this solution to estimate a preliminary factor covariance matrix across multiple asset classes. The second challenge arises because the covariance matrix for any given asset class that is produced by the EM algorithm may not correspond to the covariance matrix that is produced when we consider that asset class alone. For example, the volatility of the U.S. equity market has often been described using variants of GARCH models, which we can incorporate into a robust covariance matrix for U.S. equity factors. In general, however, this covariance matrix will differ from the covariance matrix for U.S. equity factors produced by the EM algorithm. The result of this difference is that risk predictions at the asset class level will be inconsistent with the risk predictions across asset classes.
Publication:
Authors: RUDD Andrew, SHEIKH Aamir
"Developing and Implementing Risk Management Systems", Barra Newsletter, Fall 1998, pp.1, 9-18
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Long a focal point for the sell side, risk management has recently become a central topic of discussion in the investment management community. This shift is only natural considering the substantial financial losses sustained by both financial and non-financial firms. In a very important sense, however, this transition is forcing the buy side to revisit an issue it has dealt with for many years. Quantitative portfolio managers have utilized risk management techniques for over twenty years now. For example, the construction of index portfolios minimizes the risk of the difference between the return of a portfolio and that of a broad based index of assets. Similarly, managing to a benchmark requires one to focus on the risk of the difference between the return of the managed portfolio and the benchmark portfolio. Likewise, plan sponsors often make their asset allocation decisions with the risk of the difference in fund returns and fund liabilities in mind.
Publication:
Authors: JONES Charles, ONCU Sabri, SHEIKH Aamir
"Just Say No? The Investment Implications of Tobacco Divestiture", Journal of Investing, Winter 1997, pp. 62-70
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The current arguments about whether to limit or prohibit pension fund investments in tobacco stocks, in contrast to earlier debates about "sin-free" investing, focus on investment considerations rather than morality. But tobacco divestiture doesn't stand up as an investment decision. It doesn't reduce risk in the typical pension fund context, nor does it constitute a clever active strategy issued from the legislature. We should see tobacco divestiture for what it is: a moral decision. Given that, public officials need to understand the investment cost they are paying to achieve the moral gain. Investment restrictions will reduce opportunities for outperformance for active managers, increase risk for passive managers, generate one-time excess transactions costs, and cause measurement problems associated with imperfect benchmarks. We have analyzed costs for each of these effects. With this knowledge, officials can make an informed choice about tobacco divestiture.
Publication: Journal of Investing
Authors: KAHN Ronald N., LEIMKUHLER Tom, LEKANDER Claes
"Optimization of Active Risk Across Asset Classes", 1997
This document is available in hard copy only. Please contact us to request a copy.
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The challenging aspect of the framework outlined above is the development of reasonable expectations for the results of active management. Active risks appear to be quite stable. Therefore, we have consistently assumed that active risk in each active category equals the median returns-based active risk for the corresponding RogersCasey peer group over the five years ending December 31, 1996. We chose to use this approach in order to generalize by style of management, rather than focusing on specific managers. In practice, when conducting a similar analysis for a specific investment program, it would be more appropriate to use a holdings based plan-wide risk analysis to estimate the portfolio risks. For expected active returns we have conducted three separate analyzes using differing sets of information ratio assumptions described below. Each of these is a reasonable approach although there are other alternatives. One cautionary note would be to avoid using information ratio measures for individual managers based on their historical experience because of the weak evidence of persistence for active managers.
Publication:
Authors: DEMAKIS Drew W.
"Plan-Wide Risk", RogersCasey Research Insights, 1997
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Several issues arise when analyzing plan-wide risk. What is the appropriate plan benchmark? Dies it consist of a set of investable indices? How does it reflect the liabilities that are the true underlying target for the plan? More general still, how should we define risk? Should we use value at risk or standard deviation? Should we define risk relative to the benchmark? Even after choosing a particular risk definition, we must identify all the factors which drive risk. Finally, should our forecast of risk use simply historical returns data or specifically analyze the current plan holdings? In this paper we will discuss these issues and provide for concreteness a detailed case study.
Publication: RogersCasey Research Insights
Authors: CESARE Christopher J., DEMAKIS Drew W., KAHN Ronald N.
"Quantitative Measures of Mutual Fund Risk: An Overview", chapter in Barra Research Insights Mutual Fund Risk, 1997
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Three approaches to forecasting risk include historical standard deviation, applying style analysis to historical returns to separately forecast style and selection risk, and analyzing portfolio holdings. The third approach, analyzing holdings, is the most accurate and the most costly. It is the standard choice of institutional investors. This paper will review how institutional investors have analyzed risk, and then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these three particular approaches to mutual fund risk for individual investors. The paper will also include a brief historical perspective, review the many definitions of risk, and discuss several issues of general concern for risk analysis.
Publication: Barra Research Insights
Authors: KAHN Ronald N.
"Mutual Fund Risk", Barra Research Insights, 1997
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
In 1994 many mutual fund investors experienced staggering and unexpected losses. Amid the resulting public outcry, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission considered how to better inform the public of investment risk, and asked for public commentary. The response, from many thousands of individual investors, far surpassed the SEC's expectations. The public has considerable interest in mutual fund risk. As the leading provider of risk models and analytics to the institutional investment community, Barra responded with two reports to the SEC. The first, 'Quantitative Measures of Mutual Fund Risk: An Overview,' outlined the basic issues and choices as informed by our twenty years of modeling risk. The second report, 'Forecasting Mutual Fund Risk: Current Holdings or Past Performance?' followed up with a study comparing methods for forecasting mutual fund risk. This Barra Research Insights document collects these two reports. While the topic specifically focuses on mutual fund risk, we believe the issues and conclusions will interest our institutional clients.
Publication:
Authors: KAHN Ronald N.
"Measuring Information Ratios", Barra Newsletter, Winter 1996
Topic: Performance Analysis |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The ratio of active return to active risk annualized, known as the Information Ratio (IR), is a key statistic governing active management. All investors, no matter what their aversion to risk, will seek the highest information ratio possible. Unfortunately, it's very hard to accurately measure an IR. There is no quick fix to the measurement problems confronted by the investment business.
Publication:
Authors: KAHN Ronald N.
"Seven Quantitative Insights into Active Management, Part 1", Barra Newsletter, Summer 1996
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Active management combines art and engineering. The art involves finding valuable information about future returns. The engineering involves efficiently capturing that information in superior portfolios. By assuming that it is possible to find such valuable information, we can derive many important insights into the engineering of this process. Over the next several Barra Newsletters, seven insights that follow from this perspective will be outlined. Insight One: Active management is forecasting.
Publication:
Authors: KAHN Ronald N.
"Macroeconomic Risk Perspective", Barra Newsletter, Summer 1993, p3
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Macroeconomic risk analysis can provide an intuitive framework for equity portfolios. Traditionally, investors and researchers have considered the macroeconomic approach, the fundamental approach, and the statistical approach to risk modeling to be mutually exclusive. The conventional wisdom is that if you want the forecasting accuracy of the fundamental approach, you cannot also have macroeconomic intuition. This is incorrect. Barra is now developing analytics to provide macroeconomic analysis consistent with our accurate fundamental models of risk. Our fundamental factors completely "include" the macrofactors, which we can extract. This approach extends to a natural framework for asset/liability management and opens the door to enterprise-wide risk modeling.
Publication:
Authors: KAHN Ronald N.
"New Trends in International Investing", Barra Newsletter, Winter 1995, p3
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Investment opportunities overseas continue to attract the interest of money managers in the U.S., despite the staggering drop of equity markets in developed and emerging countries earlier this year. Portfolios that once held a few select blue chip stocks in Europe and Japan are now holding increasing portions in regions such as Southeast Asia and South America as well as in a variety of stocks within developed markets. And the current trend of overseas investment has led many index providers to enhance and expand their global indices. Barra conducted a survey of U.S. equity money managers to determine new trends in international investing. We asked 23 managers to describe their level of activity and general strategy in overseas markets. Here's what they said.
Publication:
Authors: BERTOLOTTI Andre
"Applying Style Analysis to Mutual Fund Selection", Barra Newsletter, Winter 1995, p 5
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Controlling for both style and volatility reveals the greatest insight to the mutual fund investor. An investor who selects mutual funds in this manner retains control over the style mix of his or her aggregate portfolio, just as the institutional plan sponsor does by blending the custom benchmarks of the managers hired. In both cases any incremental value added by the fund manager drops through to the bottom line of the aggregate portfolio. There is another important similarity between individual and institutional fund selection: in both cases identifying the winners in advance is very hard. Despite the sobering odds, this article will compare four methods of ranking mutual funds.
Publication:
Authors: DOERSCH Todd
"Does Historical Performance Predict Future Performance?", Barra Newsletter, Spring 1995, p4
Topic: Asset Pricing and Valuation |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Which mutual funds will be next year's winners? Conventional wisdom in the investment community says that to predict future performance, look at past performance. But does it help to know last year's? Do winners repeat? The idea that winners repeat is so obvious and popular, it has spawned an entire mini-industry devoted to documenting past winners. Mutual fund performance reviews regularly appear in publications like Barron's, Business Week, and Consumer Reports. Services such as Morningstar and Lipper exist to publish mutual fund rankings. Pension plan consultants closely examine past performance before recommending managers, and successful managers proudly document their past performance. All this suggests that everyone choosing active managers, from pension plan sponsors to individual investors, thinks past performance predicts future performance. Is this true? In this article, we will review past investigations into this question, and then present new results looking at performance of active equity and fixed income managers over the past decade. (1)
Publication:
Authors: KAHN Ronald N., RUDD Andrew
"Alpha is Volatility Times IC Times Score", Journal of Portfolio Management, Summer 1994, pp. 9-16
This document is available in hard copy only. Please contact us to request a copy.
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
###############################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################
Publication: Journal of Portfolio Management
Authors: GRINOLD Richard
"Ethical Investing and the Returns to Sinful Industries", Barra Newsletter, Spring 1994, p1
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
An investor who wishes to purchase securities that reflect a 'socially responsible' investment choice, can select from a universe of securities that have been screened according to certain ethical criteria. These constraints may exclude companies in industries regarded as undesirable, or "sinful." But do such exclusions lead to potential underperformance relative to the market? We examined this question with respect to companies in the gambling, liquor and tobacco industries from January, 1980 through December, 1993 as a follow-up to a study published previously in the Barra Newsletter.(1)
Publication:
Authors: LUCK Christopher, TIGRANI Vida
"New S&P/Barra 'Style' Indices", Barra Newsletter, May/June 1992, p15
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Barra, in collaboration with Standard and Poor's Corporation, has constructed the S&P/Barra Growth Index and S&P/Barra Value Index to separate the S&P 500 into value stocks and growth stocks. The design of the indexes is an outgrowth of research into investment styles in the U.S. equity market performed in conjunction with 1990 Nobel Laureate William F. Sharpe. The indexes serve as benchmarks for institutional investors who wish to more closely track these two dominant investment styles in the market.
Publication:
Authors: BUCKLEY Oliver
"Barra Institutional Style Indices", Barra Newsletter, November/December 1991, p3
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
Barra has traditionally seen the market place as multifaceted, and we have captured those facets of the market through factors such as SIZE, VOLATILITY, SUCCESS, VALUE, GROWTH, and the like. The opposite viewpoint is the old, one-dimensional separation of stocks into large and small. Style indices represent something of a midpoint between Barra's multifaceted view of the market and the one-dimensional view. To create style indices we look along the axis of value and growth and end up with a matrix stratification into categories such as large-value, large-growth, small-value, small-growth, and so on. Style indices are similar to factors in that it is possible to define a style portfolio as a list of stock holdings. Style index portfolios have the added benefit of being a capitalization-weighted list of assets; that is, the critical item in the style portfolio is membership in the list; weighting is always in proportion to capitalization. Every asset in the market gets included in only one of the style portfolios, so we can consider the style portfolios as pieces of a mosaic; put all the pieces together and you get the market.!
Publication:
Authors: DIVECHA Arjun, GRINOLD Richard
"Value Added & Tactical Asset Allocation", Barra Newsletter, January/February 1991, p6
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
A proponent of tactical asset allocation claims that a good tactical asset allocator is more valuable than an equally good equity or bond manager. After all, the tactical asset allocator influences more assets. This assertion raises two interesting questions. What do we mean when we say an allocator or a manager is "good?" And how is value added related to assets under management? (Or, if we want to reverse causality, "How should assets under management be related to the ability to add value?")
Publication:
Authors: GRINOLD Richard
"Multiple-Manager Optimization", Barra Newsletter, November/December 1990, p1
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
It is common practice these days for large pension funds to allocate assets among multiple investment managers who specialize in investment areas. It is the sponsor's job to combine these specialized managers into an aggregate pool that is consistent with the plan's overall objectives, both for the entire fund and for each asset class. Plan objectives are often stated in terms of a target portfolio. Even when assets are allocated among multiple investment managers, matching the target is not an easy task. We will examine the problems of matching the target and present potential ways of addressing these problems in this asset reallocation case study for the fund sponsor.
Publication:
Authors: NEWHOUSE Beth
"Normal Portfolios and the Sponsor/Manager Relationship", Barra Newsletter, November 1989, p1
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The concept of a normal portfolio is a simple one on the surface. A normal portfolio is simply a portfolio that represents an investment manager's style. However, in practice one quickly uncovers a number of difficult and subtle issues that make the development of normals a task requiring great care and thought. Many of these issues are a result of the complex, and sometimes contentious, relationship between the owner of funds (the sponsor) and the manager of the funds. This note will examine normal portfolios in the context of the sponsor/manager relationship.
Publication:
Authors: MUNRO Joanna
"The Sponsor's View of Risk", Barra Newsletter, November 1989, p16
Topic: Asset Allocation and Asset Liability Management |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The whole is not the sum of its parts as far as investment risk is concerned. The same diversification of risk that makes portfolio management interesting at the individual manager's level also applies at the aggregate level and makes the management of managers a game that calls for skill and perspective. The message of this paper is that sponsors should look at portfolio risk in the aggregate. An aggregate view makes the cost of aggressiveness for active managers far smaller when viewed in the aggregate than when each manager is viewed in isolation. Multiple managers offer sponsors great diversification benefits; but sponsors need to adapt policy to take advantage of those diversification benefits.
Publication:
Authors: Source: Barra Newsletter
"Forecasting Covariance", Barra Newsletter, July 1989, p1
Topic: Factor and Risk Modeling |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The material in this article is taken from a presentation at the annual research seminar at Pebble Beach, June 4-8, 1989. Covariance is a measure of the linear relation between two random variables. On average, if the monthly returns in 1988 from holding IBM stock were positive (negative) when the returns from holding Southwest Gas were negative (positive), then the returns on these two stocks are said to exhibit negative covariance. What is the appropriate frequency to measure covariance? Is it reasonable to assume that covariance is constant over time? Is the covariance between two stock returns for the next month predictable?
Publication:
Authors: Source: Barra Newsletter
"Confessions of a Pool Player: Humility and Active Management", Barra Newsletter, December 1989/January 1990, p 5
Topic: Investing (Investment Management) |
Asset Class: Multi-Asset Class
| Show/Hide Details >>
The ingredients needed for successful active management are luck, skill, and humility. Luck and skill are obviously valuable. Humility, as in knowing what you don't know, is required when luck fails. This article shows how humility can work to your advantage. Humility places the burden of proof on the active decision. It forces the manager first to decide what portfolio to hold when he or she has no insights, and then to justify deviations from that original portfolio due to his or her particular insights. Deviations need to be justified with expectations of compensating return, and a method of portfolio construction should be used to make sure that the highest level of expected return is attained per unit of risk.
Publication:
Authors: Source: Barra Newsletter